RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2013-
00611
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 6 January 2013, be removed
from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The cardio component of her FA was conducted in an area which
did not comply with Air Force Instruction. Times and laps were
not tracked appropriately which prevented her from passing the
cardio component of her FA. She has never failed an FA in 15
years.
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a Memorandum of
Record from a meteorological technician and her Individual
Fitness Assessment History.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently a member of the Air Force Reserve
serving in the grade of master sergeant (E-7). She took a FA on
6 January 2013 scoring a composite score of 74.90, which is an
unsatisfactory score.
The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants
military service record, are contained in the evaluation
provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at
Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states the applicant did
not provide any supporting documentation indicating the run was
conducted on an indoor track versus an outdoor track or that the
indoor track was unauthorized. Without validation of
inappropriate track usage or a request from the commander to
remove the FA, they cannot remove the requested FA.
The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 31 October 2013, for review and comment within 30
days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no
response.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-00611 in Executive Session on 7 January 2014,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in connection
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00611:
Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 31 Jan 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 18 Sep 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Oct 13.
Panel Chair
2
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01974
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01974 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 14 February 2013, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 14 February 2013, the applicant completed the contested FA and received an unsatisfactory overall score of 35.90 due to completing...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05047
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05047 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 12 Oct 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The fitness monitor incorrectly counted...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03926
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03926 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) scores, dated 10 Sep 09, 10 Dec 09, 31 Aug 10, 13 Oct 10, and 16 Feb 11, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS); in the alternative, his records be corrected to reflect he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01302
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01302 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 09 Jan 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 09 Jan 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 70.88,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05279
On 25 Oct 13 she received an updated AF Form 469, stating that she was exempt from the cardio component of the FA. The applicant's AF Form 469 shows the cardio limitations expired on 23 Sep 13, which would have allowed the applicant to complete the cardio component of the FA. The applicant did not provide an updated AF Form 469 to show the exemption expired on a later date.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02801
If she had been on the correct profile when she completed the June 2011 FA, she would have passed the FA with a 75.5 score and would not have received the referral EPR. DPSID states that based on the AFPC/DPSIM advisory to grant the relief sought to exempt the cardio component of the FA dated 8 June 2011, they contend that the fitness assessment failure is an inappropriate comment on the contested referral EPR, and as a result, the referral EPR should be removed from her record. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580
A list of the applicants complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05779
A resume of the applicant's FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Rating *28 Nov 12 38.40 Unsatisfactory 31 May 12 85.90 Satisfactory 13 May 11 93.90 Excellent 23 Nov 10 80.10 Good 5 May 10 79.25 Good 2 Nov 09 85.00 Good * Contested FA The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. They...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00377
In the applicant's DD Form 149, he also indicated he had ankle pain when completing the sit-up component of the 31 August 2012 FA. Unfortunately, neither profile exempts him from the sit-up component. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05347
DPSIM states that on 15 April 2012, the applicant took an FA and received a composite score of 79.20, an unsatisfactory fitness level, because the applicant did not meet the minimum time for the cardio portion of the FA. This allows time for reconditioning, if exempted for greater than 30 days. The applicant did not provide the AF Form 422 nor AF Form 469 indicating when she was placed on profile, what her profile restrictions were, or when she was released from her profile. The complete...